This is inspired by the post asking about the BGG ratings.
I like the BGG Weight Rating. I do recognize that weight is very subjective. But I do find it a little helpful when I am researching a game. Of course the more ratings it has the more "accurate" it is. But it leads to seem really funny things. It's there a way that BGA could impliment a weight system that is fixed? Do the users of this forum like looking at weight ratings when they look at games? Are there ways that the system could be fixed.
The only idea I have is to allow people to put partial numbers in. For example 4.25.as it stands right now, you can only put whole numbers in.