This site prioritizes game information. Would you like to keep that way or would you want to priortize game prices? Prioritize PricesPrioritize Information

(Change this option in the future in the Account dropdown)

The philosophy of your collection.

Supporter

I hope that the too pretentious title doesn't raise your hopes too high for my following ramblings....

This post is inspired by a brief interchange that and I had in the comments of this post. In that brief discussion it was obvious that and I had a different ideas of what consititutes a complete collection. I judge that we all, probably, have a number of differences in the thought process we apply to our collection.

I do want to state, before I go any farther, that I have no desire to denigrate anyone elses philosophy behind their collection. I really don't care if you collect to play, or to display on the shelf, or to support the industry, or from FOMO, or whatever other reason.

But, I will explore, briefly, my concept of collecting. Firstly, I don't like to think of myself as a collector. I much prefer to think of myself as a curator. I find that this encapsulates better how I feel towards my collections, be they books, or games, or whatever else.

If you consider a curator, they are someone entrusted with the management of a specific targeted collection of some sort. They might curate the art of an art museam, or the animals of a zoo, or perhaps a private art collection of some sort. What all these positions, have in common, is that they are trying to have as representative of a collection as possible, given the scope of the collection and the budget involved. They are responsible to see after the arrangement of the collection, maintence/restoration if needed, aquiring new pieces, selling pieces, and many other things.

This is the position in which I think of myself in. I am trying to build my boardgame to be representative of my interests and desires as is possible, while remaining within the constraints of budget, space, and time. I want to have games that are fillers, and I want 6+ hour games. I want games that are super heavy, and games that are really light. I want representative board games from specific game genre's that I wish to have represented in my library.

So, from that perspective, I see the concept of a complete collection to be a achievable goal. I see the day that I have a collection that I consider complete. These would be the games that I think best represent the various categories etc. that I wish to have represented in my collection. I don't see that as stopping my acquiring of other/new games.but those new games will be providing variety, rather than being building blocks of my collection. Of course, the basic building blocks of my collection my age out with time, but, I don't see that as a problem.

Of course, I haven't gotten to this point with my game collection. So, I don't know if I will ever feel that it is complete when I get to the point that I think I should feel it complete. But, I do have experience with my home library of books. I own around 1500 volumes, and I thought I had a complete core collection of around 300ish. But, when I moved to El Salvador, I discovered I could get a complete 100 volume collection out of my bigger collection. The other 1400 volumes went into climate controlled storage. I think I can see myself getting to this point with my games. I have a core collection, which is complete. But, I can see myself not limited to what I consider to be my core "complete" and "representative" collection.

So,how do you see your collection? Do you believe that such a thing as a complete collection is possible for any individual? Do you collect with a view of how you want your collection to be? Or, do you collect with an idea of what your interests are now? 

Like| 3 comments | report | subscribe

Please log in or make an account to post a comment.

4 months ago

Not that I have thought about it too much but I think I would be unlikely to ever think of a 'complete' collection to be a static thing for my board games. I think I am approaching/at a point where I feel like I have a board game for every occaision and that I can bring a game to almost any table that will bring joy to the people sitting at it. However, I imagine my collection will evolve and change, games that were once 'central' will slip out and be replaced (not necessarily like-for-like) with new (not necessarily by year of publish just as I discover and enjoy them) over time to match my preferences (which will change) and those of the people I am trying to share my love for this hobby with.

Partner4 months ago

My collection is what you would call...a mess.

Maybe even a hot mess.

This is due, in part, to my position as a reviewer. This is also due to the fact that I find it VERY hard to part with things.

I've gotten better recently and have started to downsize. I've managed to donate around 175 games to my local library. Enough for them to have to upgrade from a board game cart to a dedicated set of shelves :) I've got about another 75 ready to go once the library is open for donations again (stupid COVID). I've also dropped a few smaller games in Little Free Libraries around town.

There's still much work to be done. I'd love to get my collection down to a "core" and I'm sure, with enough time, I can. The problem is the new boxes arriving on my doorstep every week... I've been trying to keep the "These are my games" collection and the "to be reviewed" shelves separate, but with 4 kids that's not always easy :D

Supporter4 months ago

Being a reviewer, and therefore not being as much in control over the input, would for sure make this more difficult.

Cheers, and good luck on your work on your collection.

Linked Topic